Final compositions

The assignment due this week was our final versions of our Gestalt pieces, mounted together on a black board. I made a few changes to my pieces before finalization, some drastic, some minor. To arrange the pieces on the mounting board, I tried to create a balance between the heaviness of the designs. Tension, because it has the most white space, I put in the middle. To either side of it I placed order and comfort, which have less white space but are both very structured and confined to about the middle of the page. At either end I placed congestion and playfulness, which were the heaviest of all of the designs.

---

ORDER

When receiving feedback from Somya on my pieces, for many of my pieces she challenged me to use fewer squares. I put this into practice in my order composition by removing the bottom group of squares, and I think it turned out very well. I took issue all along by the way the smallest squares seemed too close together, and I think the composition looks better without them. The new composition forms a square, which adds another dimension of order with the way it fits into the containing white box itself.

---

PLAYFULNESS

For the most part, this design remained unchanged from the previous version. I removed only one square. Again, Somya challenged me to use fewer squares, but I found that whenever I attempted to manipulate the design, I lost the feeling of playfulness to a large extent. I tried several variations using fewer squares, but was unable to find one which I felt exemplified playfulness as much as this composition.

---

COMFORT

With this design I made one of my most drastic changes. Throughout the design process, I struggled to have my composition display comfort. Somya commented that in my prior versions of the design, the eye jumps between the figure and the ground. To change this, I kept some elements of my original design, but manipulated them in a way so as to change them into something new. In this design, which I think is more comfortable to view, I created the idea of smaller blocks cradling a larger one.

---

TENSION

With this design, I took Somya’s advice of trying to display the same thing with less squares. In addition, I tried again to fix the problem I had been having that, due to the extreme angles of the blocks, the design tended to evoke playfulness rather than tension. With this design, I kept the same idea, but leveled out the bottom block, and created a distance between it and the top block, which looks as though it is about to fall on the bottom block. The angle of this block creates an uncertainty in the design about where the motion is going to go next, creating tension.

---

CONGESTION

I made very minor changes to this design. I removed many of the smaller blocks, which I found reduced the clutter of the design without confusing or decreasing the value of the emotion conveyed. In addition, I increased the size of the larger block to about the same size as it was in my original design. I find that this contrast, along with the contrast of the clutter in the bottom with the white space at the top of the design, conveys congestion very well.

Critique compositions

During class on Tuesday, Jan 29, every member of the class participated in a group critique, where we were given the chance to evaluate others’ work, and to have our own evaluated. This was a valuable experience that provided the opportunity to observe how others chose to depict the five moods, and to see where our own designs did not convey the intended message fully.

---

ORDER

“Order
Very clear!”

“Order?
I like it”

“I really like this b/c it feels like a play on words w/ “ORDER” – your squares are both orderly (in a grid) and ordered by size.”

These comments allowed me to see what I did right with this design. However, it did not give me much to work with in the form of changes. One thing that I was concerned about after I initially created the design was that the order might be lost in the smallest squares at the bottom. To rectify this, for the next iteration of my design I decided to slight increase the size of these bottom squares so that there were clearer groupings within these squares. In the process, I noticed that the differences in square size, for the most part, were rather random. I chose to adjust the sizes of all of the squares, and the white space in between, so that the entire design felt more even and deliberate.

Updated Design

---

PLAYFULNESS

“Playfullness
I feel like there is a sense of uniqueness”

“I like this one – a lot of movement, almost looks like squares are playing a game. But looks like tension – maybe exaggerate the tense design more?”

We discussed this design of mine in class as a group, and several people said that they thought the presence of the wall-like arrangement of squares to either side of the design possible contributed to a feeling of tension in the design. To rectify this, for my next iteration I removed the leftmost column of squares and added a few more squares to add a greater effect of playfulness.

Updated Design

---

COMFORT

“I’m reading comfort here, but I’m curious as to what the 3 squares/corner achieves.”

“If I were the center sq. I’d feel uncomfortable.”

As I knew would be the case, my peers were a little unclear about the intention of this design, something I also noticed when I saw others’ designs for comfort. I think comfort is a very tricky concept to convey using only squares, one that I have not yet seen depicted effectively. As such, I was a little unsure how to fix the design. I came up with the idea of changing the ratio between the outer squares and inner square. If I made the outer squares bigger, I thought it might begin to look as though they were closing in on the inner square. But if I made them too small, the inner square might look as though it was intimidating the outer ones. I wanted to keep the feeling I sensed of comforting radiating inwards towards the inner square, a comforting enclosure or embrace, if you will, so I adjusted the size of the outer squares so they were just a little bit smaller than the inner.

Updated Design

---

TENSION

“Tension, maybe? They look precariously balanced but wobbly. But could also be playful because of the angles.”

“Tension?
Looks awfully playful”

I think the confusion with the intention of my tension design partially stemmed from the fact that the angles were so extreme that they made the design look unrealistic, less like a tumbling tower and more like a playful collection. I lessened the angles of the squares for my next iteration so that they might look a little more realistic.

Updated Design

---

CONGESTION

“Congestion
Very clear.”

“Congestion?
I focus more on the big square “coming down” on the smaller ones than on the crowded nature.”

“Tension. The stress of the large object on little ones works well.”

From the comments from my peers, it seems clear that the extreme contrast between the very large square and the smaller ones was creating more of an appearance of tension than of congestion. I decreased the size of this square and tried to even out the design, so that it was clearer that the design depicted congestion, not tension.

Updated Design